Document Analysis of Julius Caesar's The Gallic War Essay

Document Analysis of Julius Caesars The G exclusivelyic contend - Essay ExampleThe Invasion of Britain The year 55 BC was Caesars first attempt at encroaching(a) Britain. It cannot be considered a complete success in the sense that after the excursion, the army went back to salientian and Britain was not occupied. But from the roman letters position, most assuredly from Caesars point of view, the invasion was a reverberate especially when he already received the homage of British tribal chiefs and kings. This, undoubtedly, was the needed evidence to lay down how the territory has already been conquered as far as the weight-lift is concerned. This first foray, however, has provided Caesar a fleeting coup doeil of the Britain and its societies. When they arrived, they found societies made up of large tribes and clans. Leaders of these groups were not averse to calling themselves kings even when all their constituents were an amalgamation of families and clans. In Caesars eyes w e are provided some details about how the early Britons conducted their affairs. For instance, he found this out for himself when he noted that the Cantii (people of Kent) have some(prenominal) kings from various kingdoms found in the region. military Strategy The first campaign involved several skirmishes with the Britons. The Romans had achieved a certain degree of success. And there were several accounts that provided a clear idea about the Roman military strategy in Gaul. The Britons like their far Gaul cousins are also tribal in the way they wage their fight. They adopted the guerilla tactic, which, of course, proven ineffective in the long run. Caesars legions were equipped and experienced in fighting in this condition. The soldiers had the benefit of Roman tuition, which produced the worlds first truly professional soldiers, those that considered their work as duty and responsibility, obeying the chain of predominate and are immune to external influence. Additionally, C aesars soldiers were already used to fighting similar strategies in their war with Gallic tribes. The long campaign in Gaul has equipped them with better understanding in get a line to the most effective approach in dealing with their British opponents. Essentially, the strategy adopted in Britain was calm of two major components the scorch earth strategy and the show of force. The former was adopted in response to the large British force. In addition, based from Caesars commentaries, the Britons also proved adept in theft and treachery. So the strategy entailed the burning and destruction of fields and property and the plunder of supplies in order to divest the opposition the resources to sustain their operations and weaken them in an effort to resolve conflict the soonest possible time. After a year passed, Caesar decided to lead another invasion and the campaign this time became a bigger conflict. The Romans and the Britons faced off in several bloody battles. The latter, of course, sustained the most damage since the training and discipline of the Roman force were unmatched. The poorly equipped British though far superior in number were still technically savages, too untrained, wielding rudimentary tools. The show of force was crucial in this campaign as demonstrated in the sheer number of Roman soldiers mobilized and the use of war machines and implements such as war elephants, which, of course, deterred much of the local populace. It is important to note