Animal Testing Is Cruel and Unnecessary Essay Example for Free

Animal examen Is ferocious and Unnecessary shewIs the Statement Animal Testing is Cruel and Unnecessary Correct? It is common knowledge that many animals atomic number 18 used in medical and scientific research. These innocent animals are often obliged to undergo unnumbered of cruel processes and endure great suffering as a result. Despite all the disputes and discussions regarding whether or not animal try oning is actually necessary, they wouldnt change the concomitant that it is, in fact, an extremely cruel thing to do.Therefore, it is lonesome(prenominal) to be expected for the need for product testing involving experiments on animals to be strongly debated. The debates themselves usually roam around scientific, ethical and even political implications, often based upon biased beliefs. For example, an animal lover would understandably be against animal testing. They would, in fact, not care whether it is necessary or not. A doctor horrendous for a new research, on the other hand, would clearly think animal testing is necessary, and ignore the fact that thousands of animals are endangered because of it.I personally think animal testing is cruel. It is an inhumane thing to do, as animals too deserve to be treated normally, and not as objects that are just used to test whether a mascara is safe enough for a persons eyelashes or not. Furthermore, it has been proven that about 9% animals such as rats, rabbits and mice end up dying after going through these experiments. Do you honestly think the change magnitude number of these animals is worth a new type of blush-on or eyeliner?Regarding the statement Animal Testing is Cruel and Unnecessary, I would have to agree with the first point Animal testing is, indeed cruel. Nevertheless, as I am not exactly experienced in the medical field, I managed to do some research, and in the end found a rather interesting quote verbalize by two doctors, Ray and denim Greek, who briefly mentioned the necessity of animal testing in their book Sacred Cows and Golden Geese. They said Animal experimentation is not necessary. It is expensive. It is inaccurate. It is misleading. It consumes limited resources. And further, it is detrimental to the very species it professes to be working to assistance humankind. coming from doctors, I found their explicit quote to be rather surprising. Moreover, even though animal testing is not always accurate, there isnt a definite answer as to whether the term Animal Testing is Cruel and Unnecessary is true or not. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, to each their own, thus I couldnt help but fathom their statement. With all these advanced technology, knowledge and finances, have we indirectly dehumanized ourselves?