English Writting Critical Response

THE CLOSING OF THE AMERICAN MIND2006Summary of Nielsen s opinion of higher education and the acquainted(predicate) school formationNeilsen criticizes present-day higher education for being linear . He implies that disciples no get alonglong see the whole contrive save kind of , they be exceptional to their own thread of choice (Nielsen 17 . This writer agrees to the consequence that colleges and universities be squ be-toed to a greater extent and much specialized , sideline the trends in contemporary work . How incessantly , it seems that Nielsen ( heyday ) is in like manner hasty in generalizing that because of this , students no interminable see the whole picture . He assumes too frequently without presenting any evidence other than , perhaps , in-person run across . Nielsen and blossom would also presum e that it is only done the understand of liberal arts and classic books that students raise discover the accuracy . This statement is certainly too regretful and it offers no get explanation of how and why they present this positionNielsen and Bloom are overly critical of modern-day education without victorious into account the scientific and attitudinal changes of that are happening everywhere in the world . They fall in to recognize that communication channels are almost infinite and passel learn from one other even if they are hundreds of miles unconnected . They fail to mention that multitude today have more access to more literature and ideas that ever before . state are no longer limited to corporal libraries but they can extract terabytes of ideas and opinions through their home computer The unaffectionate worldwide exchange of ideas is providing more learning than any physical educational institution could ever hope to provide . We are now in an age of se lf-education and traditional limited modes o! f education are belatedly losing their place in some(prenominal) the academic world and outsideNielsen also criticizes the public school system for their poor level of learning and writing instruction , forcing colleges and universities to consider remedial English classes (Nielsen 9 .

This might be received to a certain extent but once once again , neither Neilsen nor Bloom offers a reliable source of nurture . They presume that just because people watch more television receiver than in the past , they are less intelligent . It is square(a) , however , that educators must recommit themselves to excel in co mmand the basics (the three R s ) correctlyWhy would Nielsen argue that students should take both arts and sciencesQuoting Bloom , the phrase says that a cracking weapons platform for liberal education feeds the student s love of truth and furore to live a good life (Nielsen 17 . Nielsen and Bloom believe that it is not adequacy to train people to wrench excellent in their elect fields . They also contract have a all-around(prenominal) education that offers pathways to the good life of cognition and virtue (Nielsen 2 . They also criticize universities for cultivating the idea of moral relativism in the minds of the students (Nielsen 4 . They say that student direct their lives accord to principles which they find commodious and that they no longer seek for sheer(a) truths . Student would instead seek for truths...If you want to get a full essay, smart set it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a fu ll essay, visit our page: write my paper